This is a classic case of a rock and a hard place. If one refuses to accept the premise that Jews are more intelligent and this arises from genetics (not environment), one may fairly be accused of being an anti-Semite. But if one accepts the premise, then it follows that this factor is at work (in reverse) in other races, which may result in one's being accused of racism -- even a pan-racism toward anyone not Jewish.
Much very reliable evidence points to the idea that Jews are more intelligent and this arises in genetics, not environment, and that Jews' track record of exemplary scholarly achievement is not an accident, but deserved. It's very difficult to look at the scientific evidence and come to any other conclusion.
The broader implications of the above will be obvious to anyone versed in current social issues. If the case can be made that there are significant IQ differences between groups and that difference arises in genetics, the secondary conclusions are obvious. By the way, possibly apropos of nothing, Charles Murray, co-author of the infamous book "The Bell Curve", is heavily quoted in the linked article. It's as though he's saying, "I told you so."
Much very reliable evidence points to the idea that Jews are more intelligent and this arises in genetics, not environment, and that Jews' track record of exemplary scholarly achievement is not an accident, but deserved. It's very difficult to look at the scientific evidence and come to any other conclusion.
The broader implications of the above will be obvious to anyone versed in current social issues. If the case can be made that there are significant IQ differences between groups and that difference arises in genetics, the secondary conclusions are obvious. By the way, possibly apropos of nothing, Charles Murray, co-author of the infamous book "The Bell Curve", is heavily quoted in the linked article. It's as though he's saying, "I told you so."