One thing I'll note is that I'm inclined to trust the poll of engineers who have actually been using this stuff for real work, as opposed to a N=1 example of it performing well (outside the context of a real software project) and using that as the basis for declaring that This Is The Future.
I'm not saying there's not a money volcano to be had somewhere, built on top of LLMs. But his call to action is stupid. Every other "money volcano" he cites was a clever use of existing technology to meet a previously-unseen but very real need.
LLMs are the mirror image of that. They are something that's clearly, obviously useful and yet people are struggling to leverage them to the degree that _ought_ to be possible. There are no truly slam dunk applications yet, let alone money volcanos (except for the AI hype train itself.)
They are the ultimate hammer in search of a nail. And it's a pretty amazing hammer, I'm not a complete LLM skeptic. But at this point we should all be searching for the best nails, not just cheerleading for the hammer.
I'm not saying there's not a money volcano to be had somewhere, built on top of LLMs. But his call to action is stupid. Every other "money volcano" he cites was a clever use of existing technology to meet a previously-unseen but very real need.
LLMs are the mirror image of that. They are something that's clearly, obviously useful and yet people are struggling to leverage them to the degree that _ought_ to be possible. There are no truly slam dunk applications yet, let alone money volcanos (except for the AI hype train itself.)
They are the ultimate hammer in search of a nail. And it's a pretty amazing hammer, I'm not a complete LLM skeptic. But at this point we should all be searching for the best nails, not just cheerleading for the hammer.