Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah I'm not saying we should blindly extrapolate, but as I said, I see a big "fixed pie" fallacy in the opposite view:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lump_of_labour_fallacy

Just to put something out there, I think LLMs will be something like Google.

I remember when Google started improving a lot in 2003-2004, a coworker wrote a blog post "Is Google God?" People thought it was conscious.

It was absolutely revolutionary. It created huge amounts of wealth for itself and others

But clearly it hit a limit. It wouldn't surprised me if LLMs were huge boon for 5 or 10 years, and they hit a fundamental wall, stagnate, and then we repeat the cycle.



I agree with this, and LLMs seem pretty clearly the next step after search engines, in terms of intelligence augmentation. The parallels are too obvious to ignore. Search engines didn't replace humans, but they made us better at what we do, and let us do it with less effort. Also, librarians still have jobs.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: