Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

When a search provider decides to allow one side of a story to be presented but to remove sites that present the other side, that's pure bias. It may be justifiable bias; that's arguable. But you can't call that unbiased by any sensible definition.


But that's not what DDG is claiming to be doing. They're claiming to remove outright falsehoods, not anything that could be considered favorable to the russian position.


This act by definition cannot be unbiased because only one side decides what information is false.


since when falsehoods are only on one side?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: