Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | matthewfcarlson's commentslogin

I’ve started to see bug bounty programs put flags into the product (see apples target flags https://security.apple.com/bounty/target-flags/).

I wonder if it’s partially to make it easier to validate from an AI perspective


Today it’s a ban on gambling ads, but tomorrow it’s a ban on mosquitos, cancer, and discrimination.

Listing a bunch of things a lot of people don’t like isn’t a winning argument.


I like the way he included "critical minerals" in this list, sounds like the mining industry also has contributed money to his pocket.

You laugh, but thanks to those critical minerals ads during cartoons, my kids are now begging me for praseodymium and scandium. Prices for rare earths are through the roof but my 10 year old just won't accept that she can't refine advanced alloys in this economy.

If she wants to refine advanced alloys then should look into the environmental regulations first, there's a reason nearly all such processing is done in China, or South East Asia.

If there were ads promoting breeding mosquitos or deliberately inducing cancer, we could look at banning them. But there aren’t so this is a pointless take.

Advertised or not, you can take my breaded mosquitos from my cold, dead hands!

WSJ recently did a thing about it but details were rather light

They did come out with a new XDR. It’s just not 32”.

As someone who worked on the M2 Mac Pro and has a real soft spot for it, I get it. It’s horrendously expensive and doesn’t offer much benefit over a Mac Studio and a thunderbolt pci chassis. My personal dream is that vms would support pci pass through and so you can just spin up a Linux vm and let it drive the gpus. But at that point, why are you buying a Mac?

Opinions are my own obvs.


> My personal dream is that vms would support pci pass through and so you can just spin up a Linux vm and let it drive the gpus.

SR-IOV is just that? and is well supported by both Windows and Linux.


Yes- that's what I referring to. Basically the virtualization framework supporting handing a specific PCIe device off to a VM. Link management is still handled by macOS but the actual PCIe packets are handled by the VM (which could be windows or linux, which would have a GPU driver)

Under a comment regarding the O2/Octane (both of which I own :) era, I first read “vms” as VMS, not multiple instances of a VM…

> Opinions are my own obvs.

Whose else would they be?


> as someone who worked on the m2 mac pro

They're trying to make it very clear they're not speaking on behalf of Apple Inc, despite having worked (or working) there.

Big companies like to give employees some minimal "media training", which mostly amounts to "do not speak for the company, do not say anything that might even slightly sound like you're speaking for the company".


An employer's, especially as they stated having worked (and perhaps still) at Apple in the same comment.

Oh, I interpreted it as “did work using a Mac Pro” vs helped develop the Mac Pro itself.

  > > Opinions are my own obvs.

  > Whose else would they be?
On the internet? Often the opinions of others they see getting upvotes.

>> Opinions are my own obvs.

> Whose else would they be?

takes a look at the user profile

Oh, they are a journalist/writer for a big name outfit


Maybe he was trying to say he isn’t a spokesman for anyone else :-)

do / did you have to always work in the office or do you get to work from home by taking a test rig with you ? always been curious about this

Hardware generally isn't allowed outside of lockdowns. There are things you can do with dev fused hardware to remotely control it which make life easier. But most devs just come into the office since being there in person is nicer.

yeah that makes sense. thanks for replying!

The reality is that every business unit needs to justify its existence and when asking for headcount, it’s easier to point to a revenue stream you’re tied to rather than “we help sell some things to businesses”

I don’t disagree with that. But equally most business units in Apple are not tied to revenue streams. From R&D though to developers for other non-subscription software. And that’s before you then factor in the non-delivery team (eg finance, HR, lawyers, etc).

So it’s not like a review stream is a requirement.

Moreover, even back when they did have back office tooling as a revenue stream (eg OSX Server), Apple still left it to slowly rot before finally discontinuing it.

So I just don’t think this is something anyone’s Apple cares enough about. If they did, then we wouldn’t be having this conversation to begin with.


If that were the case, the only business units that would ever be get funding would be the hardware sales.

Even with AWS I doubt many of the service teams make enough money to justify their existence alone.


Are you sure Apple does their accounting in that way?

Do you have a reason to believe they don’t? We’re not talking about some weird or obscure custom, it’s just basic business ideas.

Apple famously doesn't have conventional business units.

https://www.apple.com/careers/pdf/HBR_How_Apple_Is_Organized...


Thanks for this. For someone like me who hasn't worked inside Apple, it's very useful information.

I think the burden of evidence is with you in this case. It doesn't make sense for Apple to do their accounting with such a method.

It seems like another tragedy of the commons. Consumers ultimately have the final say in climate impacts by above companies. That isn’t to say consumers are guilt free, but the power of an individual is pretty small

Like most people (at least on this thread). I’m okay with the vast majority of these things not supported in mobile safari. But man, Bluetooth would be nice. I often provision esp32 devices for various things and either I need an app or a laptop when my phone is perfectly capable.


Yeah it's killing me too. I make a product that's MFI certified and I still can't use a browser to talk to it.


$800 a month for rent is pretty good


I personally like the name fiber better than green threads. But everywhere I’ve worked in user space cooperative threads, it’s always been green threads.


They are different things perhaps? Fibers imply strict cooperative behaviour; I have to explicitly “yield” to give the other fibers a go, green threads are just runtime managed threads?


Green threads are cooperative threads. Preemption requires ability to handle hardware interrupts, which are typically handled by the OS.


What do you mean by this?


Everything purely in userspace is by definition cooperative, because to be non-cooperative, you must dip down below userspace.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: