Perhaps title had a typo?

fluorographane -> Fluorographene

Can't find a single page about fluorographane

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=fluorographane&t...

But this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorographene

Not a typo. Fluorographene is the sp² form (Nair et al. 2010). Fluorographane uses the -ane suffix to denote full sp³ saturation — same convention as graphene → graphane. The sp³ hybridization is what creates the bistable C-F orientation that stores the bit.

TIL thanks!

hmm, it isn't strictly gravitational projectile movement isn't it?

Could this be used to make better ASCII animations?

Looks like it's just find sources in Confluence against bullshit Claude Code says?

I thought it can search for online cites.

> without any validation that it was published by the expected author

SPOF. I'd suggest use automatic tools to audit every line of code no matter who the author is.

I am making something similar. Also been using Kokoro for TTS. Very cool project!

Gemma 4 is kinda too heavyweight even with E2B. I am sticking with qwen 0.8B at the moment.

> Soviet engineering wasn't sloppy. It was designed for robustness, loose tolerances and simplicity

aka "fitting".

I wrote a blog on why Soviet-style engineering is bad https://blog.est.im/2026/stderr-04

> No one has ever made a purchasing decision based on how good your code is.

But many ppl will refuse a purchasing because the product breaks randomly

I've used programs for 30 years. They have broke down randomly, despite being artisanally programmed by actual humans.

Being created by a human doesn't imbue any specific amount of reliability to a piece of software.

is this somewhat similar to Microsofot Bitnet?

Similar in spirit but different in execution as far as I can tell.