If you do this, you will start to develop spontaneous feelings of ants crawling all over you whether or not they're really there. I wouldn't recommend it.
Not just mites, we’re absolutely covered and full of commensal organisms. What’s really interesting is how specialized these organisms have become, like the difference between body and head lice. We have critters socialized to just our eyebrows and eyelashes, others only live in apocrine sweat glands, etc.
Even before you get to the literal kilograms of bacteria, fungi and other fauna in our guts we’re a whole world unto ourselves.
If you think about the most commonly accepted history of eukaryotic life, it’s been this way from the beginning! Our cells themselves are bags of specialized microorganisms that changed and became integral to each other’s existence over time.
There are many Garra rufa subspecies that were the source of compounds used in treating modern autoimmune and skin disorders.
The fishes histories go back thousands of years. As a species it is super interesting... some evolved in hot-spring conditions that would simply cook most other animals. =3
Because there hasn’t been enough time and the ecological niche is non existent… ?
However… upon further inspection, one could argue that the micro biome is full of beneficial micro organisms that have evolved to fill this niche…
[1] Staphylococcus epidermidis
This is one of the most abundant and beneficial bacteria on human skin. It produces antimicrobial peptides and metabolites that inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria.
[2] Cutibacterium acnes
Despite its association with acne, this bacterium actually plays an important role in skin health by producing propionic acid, which helps maintain skin pH and prevents overgrowth of harmful organisms.
[3] Corynebacterium species
Various corynebacteria colonize the skin and produce lipases and other enzymes that help break down sebum (skin oils) and maintain healthy skin conditions.
[4] Malassezia species
These yeasts are abundant on skin and help regulate the skin microbiome, though they can sometimes cause issues in excess.
most people find it disgusting, but some rat owners will let their rats clean their teeth and the rats seem to enjoy the activity much like how other social animals enjoy grooming each other
I think you need different marketing pages/brands to segment your customers.
The person choosing this for wedding invitations does not want to think about it being used as a marketing gimmick, and the two will pay different prices
Trying to answer what I think is the most reasonable point you’re trying to make: supply chain extends beyond you and your actions.
What if you were distributing food, and a farmer who supplied rice to one of the manufacturers of the components of your food grew that rice on a field that was contaminated with arsenic?
If you will get bad food, who are you going to blame? Very likely the person who you get the food from, not going up the supply chain like a detective.
Well actually you ate poisoned food made by someone else, which had a similar looking name (typo squatting).
Who is responsible here? One who wrote code?
In general no! The EFF is not interested in litigating laws that are firmly established! They spend their resources on cases that can set legal precedent.
When you call about something like this, they’ll try to give you some general advice and refer you to a law firm.
It reads like people are almost purposefully misinterpreting what he said to give themselves a basis to disagree.
This is what drives people on Twitter to write incredibly defensive posts that attempt to address every possible misinterpretation and criticism.
That type of writing is useless, because motivated people will still search for a new angle of disagreement, and the impact of the message is diluted by the time spent addressing the criticisms. Can you imagine how bland this would have been if he started it with an explanation of Catholic just war theory and a list of reasons why this war doesn’t qualify
A casino or bookmaker doesn't need to heuristically identify betting behaviour that's 'smart'. They don't need to spot evidence that could be hidden by good opsec. No need to find micro-expressions or hidden cheating gadgets. Nor to do background checks to know you've got a buddy with insider knowledge.
All they need to do is check if you're cashing out more chips than you came in with.
It's not trivial for the casino to track this against a determined adversary. If you're already thinking about "good opsec", you can get someone else to help cash out your winnings.
A buddy from out of town, or a losing regular, or a poker player who the casino doesn't care if they win. In Vegas some casinos' chips are negotiable, officially or unofficially, in other casinos.
Thinking about your point- I bet we do not know if some people have it on or not. It feels like something that would have to be specifically investigated.
There's a good chance they've thought of the possible benefits and determined that the benefits are so small relative to the negative side effects that they round to 0.
Like what? Have the perpetrators in epstein files been brought to justice? THere are different ways to tackle: for example explicitly fining OpenAI, Google, Meta etc. and not individuals and people who need E2E encryption, free OS and free speeech. Sounds like you would rather live in a dictatorial authoritarian police state instead of thinking for everyone. And take care of your own children. They are not my problem. GTFO
reply